Book:
Film:
To me, perhaps the most surprising aspect of the 2010 film version is its under-emphasis of the winter season foregrounded by its title. There's not a speck of snow to be seen in these Ozarks (I'm assuming that's because of budgeting considerations). Daniel Woodrell's 2006 novel is much more overtly wintry, with the season transcending the status of setting to serve almost as an antagonistic character. The harshness of the climate is conveyed through wonderfully descriptive passages, such as the following: "Clouds looked to be splitting on distant peaks, dark rolling bolts torn around the mountaintops to patch the blue sky with grim. Frosty wet began to fall, not as flakes nor rain but as tiny white wads that burst as drops landing and froze a sudden glaze atop the snow. The bringing wind rattled the forest, shook limb against limb, and a wild tapping noise carried all about. Now and then a shaking limb gave up and split from the trunk to land below with a sound like a final grunt" (p. 58).
The film does a fine job of depicting its characters as people with real lives. These hardly-well-off residents of the Ozarks aren't unevolved cavedwellers. They engage in activities the audience can identify with: going to auctions, throwing birthday parties, playing music and singing songs. Indeed, both the film and the novel on which it is based deserve credit for never pandering to "hick" stereotypes.
That said, the novel delves much more deeply into the background of the characters, not only as individuals but also as a clan. Woodrell shows the Dollys to have strong roots in the region, and his account of the clan's history and ancient religious beliefs gives the book a mythic scope reminiscent of the work of Cormac McCarthy.
In the film, Woodrell's characters are memorably embodied; Jennifer Lawrence and John Hawkes are amazing in the roles of Ree Dolly and Uncle Teardrop, respectively. The gaunt Hawkes exudes quiet menace as Ree's rough, crank-addled yet ultimately devoted uncle (his performance makes it hard to believe that this is the same actor who played the wimpy Sol Star on HBO's Deadwood). Lawrence, meanwhile, shines as the film's teenage heroine, a girl desperate to track down her shifty, crystal-meth-cooking father (if he misses his court date, the family home that he put up for bond will be lost). The talented actress captures both the courageous and anxious sides of Ree's character, and is equally effective whether exhibiting a sharp tongue or a quivering lip.
The film version, though, ignores a key component of Ree's character in the novel: her intimate, quasi-lesbian relationship with her best friend Gail. Much is lost thematically here, because the solace she seeks in Gail's arms only underscores the lack of acceptable male figures in Ree's life.
Director Debra Granik's adaptation is quite faithful to the plot of the novel. But I just wish she would have included a wrinkle from Woodrell's conclusion. When a certain job offer is made to Ree at novel's end, the author raises the possibility that additional sparks will fly from Ree's future interactions with her volatile relatives.
This is an excellent film, one well-deserving of its Grand Jury Prize at Sundance and its Academy Award nomination for Best Picture. It's eclipsed, however, by Woodrell's utterly brilliant book, a work that contends for the laurel of Great American Novel. Thus the lopsided nature of my final ranking of the two versions of the narrative:
Film: 3
/
/
/
Book: 7
2 comments:
I so agree with Gail/Ree relationship undercurrent, but it would have taken another hr of screen time to do that properly.
The lack of snow would have been a budget thing. It did look cold, but some book scenes< like ree's walk back from Thumps place showed her tough determination against the environment (a metaphor, sorry pretty pretentious, for the whole environment she was in)
Two things that jumped out at me novel vs movie were:
Pervasive drug use by most everybody in the book but not the movie. It's part of the movie all right, but man painkillers, sroooms, "doobie for your walk", "pretty bag/baby food jar" of meth and pipe passing with a Kindergarden teacher? Not to mention teardrop was ripped on crank constantly. Again it would have taken up a lot of screen time and likely have gotten in the way of Ree's journey, so I see the movie's decision. I guess it would be pretty complicated to have a 17 yr old stoner, bi-curious herione and still tell her story
And my second thing: Uncle Teardrop in the book was a cranked up, gun toting, facial "tated", ex con meth dealer/cook killer. He was a poor druggie in the movie. You got the feeling no one really wanted to mess with Teardrop in the book. In the movie I had high hopes for him in his kitchen but the barn, the ax and the "is this our time" scenes didn't quite play for me. Book Teardrop was armed and willing to kill. The reason he got ree out of the barn, got away with axing the car and stood down the cop,was people were scared he would shoot them. Two quotes by Teardrop that didn't make the movie script sum this up "You got to be ready to die everyday-thenyou got a chance" and "Say yes'n see"
I've gone on to long. loved the book and the movie. would love to see Ree agian in fiction, but it doesn't look like Woodrell does that
Thanks for the comments, Garth. It sounds like you are a big Woodrell fan. (If you liked Winter's Bone, you might also enjoy The Reapers Are the Angels by Alden Bell. The author has admitted that Ree Dolly was one of the inspirations for his heroine.)
Post a Comment